Sakadojo Reviews

I was peeped in the public bath. In the past user's review, it was said that "bad evaluations will be deleted", so it may be deleted, but I will review it. I used "Tsukimikage no Yu". There was a door called "inspection door" near the exit leading to the open-air bath. I doubted my eyes and checked it several times, but it was clearly facing the bathhouse, not the staff, so I called the front desk on the phone in the dressing room. The staff who answered the phone hung up saying, "I'm going to look around," and after about 10 minutes, a female staff member came to the dressing room. There was no one in the bathroom or dressing room, and I was alone and confused with fear. I don't care about the times, did you doubt the mistake? Waiting for my husband outside the bathhouse wearing only clothes without shampooing, telling the front desk that I was peeping. According to the staff, there was a shadow of a person on the surveillance camera. The ryokan side said, ``We will strengthen patrols,'' but when I asked the staff who were patrolling, ``Is there anyone suspicious? It's not a place where people pass by on footpaths." I felt like I didn't want to make a big deal out of it. Also, when I asked a male staff member if the bathroom could be seen from the outside through the glass inspection door, he said, "I don't know." I wanted to avoid falling asleep, so I asked the police to be called, and about five people, including the detective, came to the museum. After explaining the situation to the police and checking the scene, it was discovered that the place where the man was standing was unprocessed glass. There was a warning from the police to the ryokan, saying, ``That door should be completely exposed from the outside, so it's better to blindfold it. In the morning, the baths that can be used by men and women change, so when I asked my husband to look at the "inspection door" of the bath the next morning, he said that measures such as blindfolding had not been taken. Even if it's something simple, shouldn't there be some kind of countermeasure? Why don't you respond when the police get involved? Also, according to the story I heard from the staff, something like a camera flash has shone in the past. The culprit is 100% bad, but isn't it laziness on the part of the ryokan that they don't take measures even if there are past cases? Even if you make the excuse that the ryokan had installed surveillance cameras, the result is damage, so it means that it wasn't perfect. I think that the fact that you can pinpoint what you can see at that location means that you have already peeped at it multiple times. Some people may be traumatized, and there is a risk of being photographed, so please take measures quickly for future users. As for the other points about the ryokan, the amenities are subtle, and the breakfast buffet has too much salt if you stay for a long time, so you need to be careful about how you eat it.